Just in case this blog would be thought of as an APRA “love-in” I thought a quick piece on where APRA are not doing well (compared to where we would hope they would be, rather than other regulators) on their Basel II implementation would be in order. There are several areas where APRA are not doing well. Most are in the practical application of their various standards that relate to Basel II in Australia. There are also several areas where the guidance is lacking, even though it would be a critical input to the whole compliance framework.
Demonstrating compliance
One of the main areas still open is around how the banks demonstrate compliance. Up to this point, the majors have had a few visits from APRA and a sign-off on their data processes from an external party (mostly their auditors). One of the major questions going forward is: “What, exactly, do the sign offs involve?” Many of the models the banks are using for compliance are very complex, involving gigabytes of data accumulated at the banks over many years. Some of the data goes back 25 years or more. Are the auditors (and others providing sign offs) expected to:
- Go through all the data for all of those years and make sure it is materially correct?
- Understand the models to a sufficient depth to say they are materially correct? and
- Provide comfort that, in every location where those models are being used, they are being used appropriately?
If not, what is being signed off on?
Home-host
The home-host issues with Basel II compliance are the subject of long
debate, so I will not do more here than attempt to make it relevant.
The problem is that APRA are not providing guidance on this, so local
branches and subsidiaries of overseas banks are in limbo at the moment.
In places where APRA diverges from international practice (and there are
a few – mostly explainable) which one predominates or does the local
entity have to apply both standards where they are different? True, over
80% of Australian banking assets are not covered by any home-host
issues, but some firm guidance here would be very useful for the 20%.
Stress Testing
The old bugbear is still there. What is a stress test? Despite the BCBS’s ‘clarification’ on this topic, covered below, there is still no effective coverage on this. To be fair to APRA on this, the FSA, with much greater resources, has only just got some decent papers out on this (see here and here), but it should not still be on open question. If APRA just repeated the FSA guidance it would at least be a good start.
4 comments
23 October, 2006 at 20:08
penguinunearthed
Another issue is what you’re supposed to do about the non banking parts of the conglomerate (which generally have their own prudential standards). Things like Operational Risk, particularly, are very vague, particularly when there is no specific operational risk standard in the insurance capital requirements (as banking used to be) there is a risk of effective double count, as op risk is required at the top, as well as capital being required at the bottom.
23 October, 2006 at 21:09
ozrisk
Any picture on whether APRA are likely to implement Solvency II here? From my understanding that should go some way to reducing the double counting problems.
25 October, 2006 at 00:18
penguinunearthed
The consensus is 2010 at the earliest. Certainly not until they’ve got Basel II bedded down, and the Europeans have well and truly figured it all out. Not before the long promised conglomerates standard, anyway.
11 August, 2008 at 02:08
Antonino Rinaudo
To Whom It May Concern:
I am seeking to learn how a program can be devleoped or purchased for seven stres test scenarios that includes interest rates from overnight to 3 years. The scenarios consist yeild curve steepners, inversions, interest rate increments of 200 basis points up to the first seven months to 50 basis points there after, or inversions of 50 basis points for the first seven months and 25 basis points thereafter. the stress test also consist of 100 basis point increments and macro and micro level movements.
It was decided that our department must run the stress test and not risk management and most of us admit we do not know how to create a spread sheet for such a project. We are hoping that we can purchase a program so that our IT area can assist us with this project.
Please kindly respond with such information or consultants that can assist us at my email address acrinaudo@verizon.net
Sincerely,
Tony Rinaudo