Can anyone tell me whether retail banking needs grading philosophy and grade definition just like corporate? What about Master scale for PD, is it common to have seperate master scale for retail and corporate?
Recent Comments
Most read recently
- Bank Liquidity Management
- Basel II - and the Move to Basel III
- Can "Fractional Reserve" be Banned?
- "Sub-prime" - is this the last great risk management failure?
- Alex and SocGen
- AASB 139 (IAS 39) in Australia - The main challenges for Banks
- Basel II in Australia - Approvals Announced!
- Accord Implementation Progress - Basel III?
Banking & Risk Blogs
- Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
- Bankelele
- Bankervision
- Banking Law Professor
- Bankwatch
- Better Banking Blog
- Calculated Risk
- Digital Money Forum
- IT Management Life
- Martin Davies
- Mobile Banking
- Neosophic
- Operational Risk Blog
- Ops Risk and Compliance
- Ops Risk Info Community
- Risk Friends
- Risking It
- RNCOS Blog on Banking
- Savings and Loans Credit Union Blog
- Sox First
- The Bank Channel
- The FinanSer
- The Garland Group Blog
- Toomre Capital Markets
- Wilmott
Banks
Information Services
Islamic Finance
Of Interest
Regulators
Categories
Accounting Anti-money laundering Australian Implementation Banking Theory Bank Regulation Banks Basel II Basel II Changes BIS Business Central Banking Credit Risk Default Analytics Deposit Insurance Insurance Islamic Banking Islamic Finance Liquidity Risk Metablogging Offshoring Of Interest Operational Risk Opinion Other ADIs Regular Features Regulators Retail Banking Risk Management Stress Testing US Implementation
a
We get older
Some Rights Reserved
The New BIS Feed
- 01Dec/Jean-Claude Trichet: Interview with Al-Ahram (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 01Dec/Ardian Fullani: Albania - optimistic, flexible and adaptive to challenges (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 01Dec/Pierre Duguay: Fostering financial system stability (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 01Dec/Lorenzo Bini Smaghi: Restoring confidence (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 01Dec/Ignazio Visco: Retirement saving and the payout phase - how to get there and how to get the most out of it (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 28Nov/Jean-Pierre Roth: Central bank communication policies and the challenges posed by the financial crisis (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)
- 28Nov/Henrique Meirelles: Bretton Woods II - on its way out? (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)




3 comments
Comments feed for this article
9 August, 2006 at 9:07 am
ozrisk
My understanding is that banks usually will not consider a separate grading definition and master scale for their retail rating system. Unlike corporate, retail credit has a much more automated and systematic credit approval process where human judgement is rarely required.
Having said that, for the sake of reporting, you may try to map the retail rating scale to your corporate rating scale such that same grading definitions may be applicable to both type of exposures. For example,
AAA grade definition (PD 0.030% to 0.045%) is define as the highest credit quality. Exceptional capacity for timely fulfilment of financial obligations and most unlikely to be affected by any foreseeable adversity. Extremely strong financial condition and very positive non-financial factors.
However the definition contain terms that are specific to corporate such as ‘financials’. However ‘financials’ can also mean in the retail world, the capacity of the borrower i.e. income, asset to liabilities ratio, past performance behaviours, etc. and ‘Non-financials’ would represent information such as education level, time on books, age, etc.
Finally, it is highly likely that your bank will result in a concentration problem if the retail PD is to be mapped to your corporate or group master scale. Typically, the master scale are much broader in corporate than in retail resulting in concentration issues.
Hope this help! Good luck!
8 September, 2007 at 4:10 pm
Shyamsundar Baliga
It is necessary to have separate scales for retail and corporates considering the expected differences in default rates. Else there is a risk that the entire retail portfolio may get mapped to a single corporate grade, which would defeat the purpose of grading.
Having said that, if the purpose is to see the grading of the overall exposure of the firm then it might make sense to ignore differences in nature of exposures (retail or corporate) and grade them on one scale. But I havent seen anyone doing this.
16 October, 2007 at 12:13 am
terrence
Hi can anyone share some knowledge on how to perform master scaling for PD estimated models?